Counsel for appellant sought permission to withdraw appeal due to compromise with respondent bank involving payment. Court dismissed the appeal as withdrawn.
Permission granted to withdraw the appeal; appeals dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH
R.S.A. No. 2054 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: November 4,2011
Jasapal Singh Aulakh and another .................... Appellants
versus
State Bank of Indian and another .............. Respondents
Coram: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Ritu Bahri
Present: Mr. Dhirinder Chopra, Advocate for the appellants.
RITU BAHRI, J. (Oral)
Counsel for the appellants states that on 1.9.2011 the matter has been compromised with the Bank and the appellants have agreed to pay `4,40,000/- upto 31.12.2011. In view of the compromise, learned counsel seeks permission to withdraw the present appeal.
The compromise is taken on record as Annexure
A1.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
4.11.2011 rupi
( RITU BAHRI ) JUDGE
Jasapal Singh Aulakh
State Bank of Indian
Ritu Bahri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
