Thus, a perusal of the aforesaid notification would show that vide aforesaid notification all the Additional District Judges in the State of Punjab have been empowered to hear appeals arising out of all orders of the Rent Controllers passed in the proceedings under the said Act, whereas, in the notification of 1947 the Appellate Authorities under the said Act were vested with powers of Appellate Authority only with respect to orders passed by the Rent Controllers under sections 4,10,12 and 13 only. In fact, under the aforesaid notification dated 29.4.1976, the Appellate Authorities under the provisions of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, have been vested with much wider powers for the purpose of the said Act to be exercised by them in their respective jurisdiction in respect of such appeals arising from orders passed by the Rent Controllers, whereas, vide earlier notification dated 14.4.1947, the Appellate Authorities were vested with the powers of the Appellate Authority only with respect to the orders passed by the Rent Controllers under sections 4,10,12 and 13 of the Act only. In fact, the notification dated 29.4.1976 was not brought to the notice of the Hon'ble Full Bench of this Court in M/s Daya Chand Hardayal's
