The High Court of Punjab and Haryana held that the appeal rendered infructuous due to efflux of time and the sale of the property in question. The appeal was disposed of accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RSA No.1609 of 1989 (O&M) Date of Decision : 11.11.2011
Jagdish Rai
... Appellant
versus
Municipal Committee, Jind & another
... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA
Present : Mr. Fateh Saini, Advocate for the appellant.
Tejinder Singh Dhindsa, J.
Learned counsel appearing for the appellant states that by efflux of time and on account of the fact that the appellant has since sold the property in question, the appeal has been rendered infructuous.
Disposed of accordingly.
November 11, 2011 sonia
(Tejinder Singh Dhindsa) Judge
Jagdish Rai
Municipal Committee, Jind
Tejinder Singh Dhindsa
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
