State of Hry. etc. v. Balbir Singh etc.
Case brief
What is this about?
Headnote unavailable as the judgment is a merely referent order that defers to reasons recorded in a separate order.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
R.F.A. No. 1439 of 2007 (O&M)
(L.A.C. No.115 of 2002)
State of Haryana
...... Appellant
Versus
Balbir Singh and another
.... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL
Present: Mr. Ashish Gupta, Asstt. Advocate General, Haryana.
Mr. S.K. Bhardwaj, Advocate, for the respondents.
RAJESH BINDAL J.
For orders, see detailed reasons recorded in a separate order passed today in R.F.A. No.2106 of 2006, titled as State of Haryana Versus Banwari and others.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
State of Haryana
- respondent
Balbir Singh
- respondent
another
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Punjab & Haryana HC
- Decided on
- · February
- Registered
- Case no.
- RFA/1439/2007
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court