The High Court ruled that the present Letters Patent Appeal has been decided by a separate order passed on the same date in Letters Patent Appeal No.142 of 2010.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Letters Patent Appeal No.1542 of 2010 Date of decision: 21.04.2011
Asset Reconstruction Company (India) Limited (ARCIL)
…..Appellant
versus
M/s PML Industries Limited and others
……Respondents
CORAM: Hon’ble Mr.Justice Jasbir Singh Hon’ble Mr.Justice Rakesh Kumar Garg
Present: Mr.Ashok Aggarwal, Senior Advocate with Mr.Sumeet Goel, Advocate for the appellant Mr.A.K.Chopra, Senior Advocate with Ms.Rupa Pathania, Advocate for the respondent No.1 Mr.Manohar Lall, Addl.A.G.Punjab for the State
Jasbir Singh, J.
For order, see order of even date, passed in Letters Patent Appeal No.142 of 2010, titled as Asset Reconstruction Company (India) Limited (ARCIL) versus M/s PML Industries Limited and others .
(Jasbir Singh) Judge
21.04.2011 (Rakesh Kumar Garg) gk Judge
Asset Reconstruction Company (India) Limited (ARCIL)
M/s PML Industries Limited
Jasbir Singh
Rakesh Kumar Garg
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
