The High Court of Punjab and Haryana allowed the withdrawal of a bail petition filed under Section 439 CrPC. The trial court was directed to expedite the trial as the petitioner had been in custody since November 2009.
Bail petition allowed subject to withdrawal of the application; trial court directed to expedite trial.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
Crl.M.No.M-10722 of 2011(O&M) Date of Decision: April 19, 2011
Nasir
.....Petitioner
v.
State of Haryana
.....Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA
Present: Mr.B.R.Vohra, Advocate for the petitioner.
......
RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral)
Crl.M.No.19720 of 2011
Application is allowed subject to all just exceptions.
Crl.M.No.M-10722 of 2011
The present petition filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure is for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.16, dated 8.1.2005, under Sections 302, 201 IPC, registered at Police Station Hathin, District Palwal.
Learned counsel for the petitioner requests for withdrawal of this petition, at this stage.
Dismissed as withdrawn, at this stage.
However, learned trial Court is directed to expedite the trial as petitioner-accused has been continuing in custody since 19.11.2009.
Registry is directed to send copy of this order to learned trial Court for strict compliance.
19.4.2011
(Ram Chand Gupta) Judge
meenu
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to allow the withdrawal of the bail petition and direct expedited trial?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Nasir
State of Haryana
Ram Chand Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
