P.R.T.C. v. Ishan
Case brief
What is this about?
28231-CII of 2010 in F.A.O. No. 6484 of 2010…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CM No. 28231-CII of 2010 in F.A.O. No. 6484 of 2010
Present Mr. Anupam Singla, Advocate, for the appellant-PRTC
Mr. Sherry K. Singla, Advocate, for the respondent-claimant.
Delay of 22 days is prayed to be condoned. It is delay of a very short period, which is not opposed on the other side.
Hence, the application for condonation of delay is allowed. The delay of 22 days in bringing the appeal is condoned.
(VIJENDER SINGH MALIK) JUDGE
November 17th, 2011 som
CM No.24549-CII of 2010 in F.A.O. No.5598 of 2010
Present Mr. Vivek Goel, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. P.S.Dhaliwal, Advocate, for respondent No. 2.
Mr. M.B.Jain, Advocate, for respondent No.3.
Mr. Anil Kumar, Advocate, for respondent no.4.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Pepsu Road Transport Corporation, Patiala
- respondent
Ishan
Coram
Vijender Singh Malik
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Punjab & Haryana HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- FAO/6484/2010
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court