Surjit Kaur v. Rajwant Kaur and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Order referencing separate detailed order passed in F.A.O. No. 5622 of 2009. This judgment provides no substantive reasons or independent disposition.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
FAO No. 5623 of 2009 (O&M)
Surjit Kaur
.....Appellant
Versus
Rajwant Kaur and others
......Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL
Present: Mr. S.P. Jain, Senior Advocate with Mr. Dheeraj Jai, Advocat for the appellants.
Mr. Gagan Inder Singh, Advocate for respondent No.1.
Mr. Yatinder Sharma, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab.
RAJESH BINDAL, J
For orders, see detailed reasons recorded in a separate order passed today in F.A.O. No. 5622 of 2009, titled Kuldip Kaur Vs. Jarnail
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Surjit Kaur
- respondent
Rajwant Kaur
Coram
RAJESH BINDAL
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Punjab & Haryana HC
- Decided on
- · February
- Registered
- Case no.
- FAO/5623/2009
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court