The order is a procedural direction referring parties to a detailed previous order. It contains no substantive discretionary decision or legal proposition requiring citation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
FAO No. 1213 of 1989 (O&M)
Union of India and others
.....Appellants
Versus
Nanku and others
......Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL
Present: Mrs. K.K. Kahlon, Advocat for the appellants.
None for the landowners.
RAJESH BINDAL, J
For orders, see detailed reasons recorded in a separate order
passed today in F.A.O. No. 1131 of 1988, titled Nanku and others Vs.
Union of India and another.
(RAJESH BINDAL) JUDGE
07.02.2011 sharmila
Union of India and others
Rajesh Bindal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
