The Haryana Warehousing Corpn v. Smt. Manshi Devi & Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
1989 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND…
1989 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
FAO No.467of 1989 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
FAO No. 467 of 1989 (O&M) Date of Decision: 14.02.2011
The Haryana Warehousing Corporation
...Appellant
Versus
Smt. Manshi Devi and others
.....Respondents
CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal
Present:Mr. Harit Sharma, Advocate for the appellant.
RAJESH BINDAL, J.
Challenge in the present appeal is to the order passed by the Commissioner under the Employees Compensation Act, 1923 (for short “the Commissioner), awarding the compensation to respondents No.1 and 2 on account of death of Jaswant Rai @ Jaswant Singh. The claimants were the parents.
The deceased was employed with the appellant as Godown Attendant-cum-Chawkidar. The Commissioner assessed the compensation payable to the claimants at ` 64,584/-. Jaswant Rai died on account of consumption of Aluminium Phosphide.
A perusal of the file shows that on January 12, 2009, actual date notices were directed to be issued for service of respondents No.1 and 2-claimants, the parents of the deceased. Office report shows that the notices issued to them were received back with the report that both have expired. Considering the factual position without opining on the merits of the controversy as such, however, considering that now it may not be possible to recover the amount of compensation from the persons who have already expired, no further orders are required in the present appeal.
Dismissed.
(RAJESH BINDAL) JUDGE
14.02.2011 sharmila
FAO No.467of 1989 2
The Haryana Warehousing Corporation
Smt. Manshi Devi
Rajesh Bindal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court