Disposes of two connected writ petitions challenging the selection of Assistant Sub Inspectors. The court notes the selection was set aside by the Supreme Court, rendering petitions infructuous, and dismisses them while allowing petitioners to re-approach if grievances persist against the subsequent selection.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Civil Writ Petition No.9960 of 1991(O&M) Date of decision:15.07.2011
Vijender Kumar Kohli ...Petitioner
versus
The State of Haryana and others ....Respondents II. Civil Writ Petition No.10069 of 1991(O&M) Rajpal Singh and others ...Petitioners
versus
State of Haryana and others ....Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN
Present: Mr. Ram Kumar Malik, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Vijay Dalunga, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Satbir Singh Goripuria, DAG, Haryana.
----
----
K.Kannan, J. (Oral)
Civil Writ Petition No.9960 of 1991(O&M) - 2 -
list was changed and even persons, who did not appear in the exam or physical test, had been selected.
as mentioned above.
(K. KANNAN) JUDGE
15 .07.2011 sanjeev
Vijender Kumar Kohli
The State of Haryana
K. Kannan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
