application of mind in this regard. The authorities below ought to have discussed the evidence brought on record and were legally required to record valid reasons for arriving at a right conclusion, in order to decide the real controversy between the parties in the right perspective. Such statutory authorities, exercising the powers under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 as envisaged under Section 7 (3) of the Act, should act independently instead of functioning as a representative of the State/G.P. It is now well settled principle of law that every action of such authority must be informed by reasons. The order must be fair, clear, reasonable and in the interest of fair play. Every order must be confined and structured by rational and relevant material on record because the valuable rights of the parties are involved. The same are totally lacking in this case. Therefore, the impugned orders cannot legally be maintained. So, taking into consideration the totality of the facts and circumstances emanating from the record as discussed hereinabove, to me, justice would be sub served, if the matter is remanded back to the A.C.Ist Grade to enable him to decide the question of title at first instance, in the obtaining circumstances of the case.
