Writ petition set aside for want of prosecution as petitioners failed to appear despite repeated calls, indicating lack of interest.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Civil Writ Petition No. 8296 of 1993
Date of decision: July 20, 2011
Rakesh Sood and others
.. Petitioners
Vs.
The Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Punjab and others
.. Respondents
Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.N. Jindal
Present: None.
A.N. Jindal, J
None has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioners despite repeated calls. It appears that the petitioners are no more interested in pursuing the case any further.
Dismissed for want of prosecution.
July 20, 2011 deepak
(A.N. Jindal) Judge
Rakesh Sood and others
The Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Punjab and others
A.N. Jindal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
