A single-judge bench dismissed two writ petitions filed under Article 226 challenging a notification and declaration under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, holding they could not survive a prior Division Bench order dismissing similar challenges. No precedents were relied upon.
Dismissal of CWP No. 7813 of 1992 and CWP No. 7880 of 1992
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-1-
CWP No. 7813 of 1992
IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH
1. CWP No. 7813 of 1992 Date of Decision: October 13, 2011
Arjan Singh …Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and others ...Respondents
2. CWP No. 7880 of 1992
Balwant Singh Puri ....Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and others ...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV NARAIN RAINA
Present: Mr. M.L. Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner(s)
Mr. S.S. Pattar, Sr. DAG, Haryana for the respondents-State.
M.M. KUMAR, ACJ.
-2-
CWP No. 7813 of 1992
notifications have already been challenged by filing a bunch of petitions including CWP No. 4958 of 1992 and a Division Bench of this Court had dismissed the writ petitions vide order dated 04.12.1992. In view of the Division Bench judgment dated 04.12.1992, rendered in CWP No. 4958 of 1992, the present writ petitions would not survive and deserve to be dismissed.
(M.M. KUMAR) ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
(RAJIV NARAIN RAINA) JUDGE
October 13, 2011 Atul
1 issue framed by the court
Whether writ petitions challenging notification and declaration under Land Acquisition Act survive a previous dismissal by the Division Bench.
3 provisions across 2 enactments
Arjan Singh
Balwant Singh Puri
State of Haryana
M.M. KUMAR
RAJIV NARAIN RAINA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
