Petitioner withdrew the constitutional petition under Article 226, resulting in dismissal of the writ petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.720 of 2011 Date of decision: 28.01.2011
Naresh
.. Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and others
.. Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER
a). Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? b). To be referred to the Reporters or not ? c). Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ?
Present:- Mr.Ashwani Kumar Bura, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Harish Rathee, Sr.DAG, Haryana, for the respondents.
MAHESH GROVER J. (ORAL)
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that he wants
to withdraw the petition and the same may be dismissed as such.
Ordered accordingly.
January 28, 2011 Sukhpreet
(MAHESH GROVER) JUDGE
Naresh
State of Haryana
Mahesh Grover
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
