The Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the refusal of commission as Lambardar due to disqualifications of existing candidates, holding no ground for interference in extraordinary jurisdiction.
The petition was dismissed as no ground for interference in extraordinary writ jurisdiction was made out.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH
Civil Writ Petition No.5307 of 2011 Date of Decision: March 23, 2011
Bahadur Singh
.....PETITIONER(S)
VERSUS
Financial Commissioner (Appeals-I), Punjab & others
.....RESPONDENT(S)
. . .
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA
PRESENT: - Mr. Amandeep Singh Cheema, Advocate, for the petitioner.
. . .
AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral)
CWP No.5307 of 2011 [2]
dated 5.11.2008 (Annexure P-3). The Financial Commissioner, vide Order dated 4.8.2010 (Annexure P-1) passed in revision filed by respondent No.4, Sukhjinder Singh, has remanded the case so as to call for fresh applications for the post of Lambardar.
CWP No.5307 of 2011 [3]
passed by the Financial Commissioner. It has been concluded that the petitioner would not be available to serve as Lambardar.
persons has been considered to be suitable, the
impugned order has been passed asking the Collector to invite fresh applications in the hope that a better person would apply who could be selected.
application, in the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case because the Financial Commissioner, vide order impugned in that case,
asked for fresh applications to seek wider
CWP No.5307 of 2011 [4]
choice. In the case in hand, some kind of a taint or disability is attached to the claim of every candidate and therefore, the case is not covered by the judgment cited on behalf of the petitioner.
(AJAI LAMBA)
March 23, 2011 JUDGE avin
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the Financial Commissioner had the authority to remand the case to invite fresh applications for the post of Lambardar given the demerits of existing candidates.
Whether the petitioner made out any ground for interference in extraordinary writ jurisdiction regarding the impugned order.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Gurlal Singh vs. Financial Commissioner (Revenue) Punjab & othersDistinguished¶18
2008(4) RCR (Civil) 792, Gurlal Singh vs. Financial Commissioner (Revenue) Punjab & others
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Bahadur Singh
Financial Commissioner (Appeals-I), Punjab
Sukhjinder Singh
Niranjan Singh
AJAI LAMBA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
