A writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution was withdrawn by the petitioner. The court granted liberty to file a fresh petition challenging the vires of the Petroleum and Mineral Pipelines Act, 1962.
Liberty to file a fresh writ petition was granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 23494 OF 2010 DATE OF DECISION: March 14, 2011.
Parties Name
Teerath Singh
...PETITIONER
VERSUS
Union of India and another
...RESPONDENTS
CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jasbir Singh Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kumar Garg
PRESENT: Mr. Mukesh Kumar Verma, Advocate, for the petitioner
Mr. Anil Malhotra, Advocate,
Jasbir Singh, J. (oral)
JUDGMENT
Counsel for the petitioner wishes to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to file fresh one after giving better particulars and also laying challenge to the vires of the provisions of the Petroleum and Mineral Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of Users in Land) Act, 1962 (Act No. 50 of 1962 as amended). Liberty granted.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
( Jasbir Singh ) Judge (Rakesh Kumar Garg) Judge March 14, 2011. DKC
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Teerath Singh
Union of India
Jasbir Singh
Rakesh Kumar Garg
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
