Petitioner withdrew a writ petition. Despite withdrawal, the court directed the Additional Registrar-cum-Chief Auditor to decide the underlying matter of urgency within three months.
Petitioner to withdraw; Authority to decide matter within three months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
C.W.P. No. 2318 of 2011 Date of decision : 08.02.2011
Smt. Jai Hind Kumari
...Petitioner
versus
The State of Haryana and others
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR
Present: Mr. D.V. Sharma, Sr.Advocate with Mr. Harit Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner.
M ehinder S ingh S ullar, J. (Oral)
After arguing the matter for some time, learned counsel intends to
withdraw the instant writ petition.
litigation and urgency of the matter, the Additional Registrar-cum-Chief Auditor, Co-operative Societies, Panchkula (Haryana), is directed to decide the matter, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of the certified copy of this order.
( M ehinder S ingh S ullar ) Judge
February 08, 2011 G.Arora
Smt. Jai Hind Kumari
The State of Haryana
Mehender Singh Sullar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
