Tara Chand and Anr. v. Maharshi Dayanand Uni, Rohtak and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
of 2010 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB &…
of 2010 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB &…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.W.P. No.20810 of 2010 -1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
C.W.P. No.20810 of 2010 DATE OF DECISION : 7.2.2011
Tara Chand and another
PETITIONERS
VERSUS
Maharshi Dayanand University, Rohtak and others RESPONDENTS
CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER
Present:Shri R.S.Malik, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri Anurag Goyal, Advocate for the respondents 1 and 2. Ms.Savitri Bhandari, Advocate for respondent-3
MAHESH GROVER, J.
Learned counsel for the respondent/University states that the detailed mark-sheets of the petitioners have been dispatched to them and since this is the only prayer made in the writ petition, the same has been rendered infructuous.
Learned counsel for the petitioners has not controverted this fact.
Having regard to the aforesaid categoric statement which has been
C.W.P. No.20810 of 2010 -2-
made by the learned counsel for the respondents, the instant petition is rendered infructuous and is disposed of as such.
(MAHESH GROVER) February 7, 2011 JUDGE GD
Tara Chand
Maharshi Dayanand University, Rohtak
Mahesh Grover
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court