Petitioner sought appointment for DPE post with 61.40% merit. Court issued direction to respondents to verify appointments of lower merit candidates in female general category within two months.
Direction to verify appointment of lower merit candidates and consider petitioner's claim for appointment within two months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.19702 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision: 13.09.2011
Sandeep Kaur
VS.
State of Punjab & Ors.
. . . . Respondents
CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT
1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2. To be referred to the Reporters or not?
3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?
Present: Mr. KPS Sandhu, Advocate for the petitioner
Ms. Sudeepti Sharma, DAG Punjab
SURYA KANT J. (ORAL)
CWP No.19702 of 2009.doc
13.09.2011 (S u r y a K a n t) vishal shonkar Judge
2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether appointment must be made to petitioner under merit criteria of educational service provider post.
Verifying if any candidate in female general category has been appointed below merit point 61.40%.
Sandeep Kaur
State of Punjab
Surya Kant
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
