The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed a writ petition seeking permission for the petitioner to work as a Store Keeper. The court held that the petition had become infructuous due to the efflux of time and did not grant any stay.
No effective relief granted; petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Civil Writ Petition No. 19144 of 1991
DATE OF DECISION: September 22, 2011
Swaran Singh Saini
.....Petitioner
VERSUS
The State of Haryana and others
....Respondents
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH
PRESENT: Mr. Ranjit Saini, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Sunil Nehra, Sr. DAG, Haryana, for the State.
RANJIT SINGH, J.
While admitting this writ petition, no stay was
granted. Thus, at this stage, no effective relief can be granted to the petitioner. So far as his prayer for permitting him to work as Store Keeper is concerned, in my view, the writ petition has become infructuous by efflux of time.
The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed.
September 22, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) monika JUDGE
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petition regarding employment as Store Keeper should be allowed.
Whether a stay could be granted at the stage of admission of the writ petition.
Swaran Singh Saini
The State of Haryana
Ranjit Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
