In a writ petition, the High Court of Punjab & Haryana disposed of the matter by directing the Director General of Police, Punjab, to decide the petitioner's representation within two months of receiving the order.
Direction to Director General of Police, Punjab to decide the petitioner's representation within two months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Civil Writ Petition No. 18847 of 2011 Date of decision : 05.10.2011
Ajay Kumar Sharma
...Petitioner
versus
State of Punjab and others
..Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR
Present: Mr. Sandeep S. Majithia, Advocate for the petitioner.
M ehinder S ingh S ullar, J. (Oral)
After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner, going through the record, with his valuable assistance and considering the entire matter deeply, the writ petition is disposed of with the direction to Director General of Police, Punjab-respondent No.2, to decide the representation (Annexure P-6) filed by the petitioner and to take appropriate action, in accordance with law, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of the certified copy of this order.
October 05, 2011 ( M ehinder S ingh S ullar ) naresh.k Judge
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition inviting a response to a representation within two months to decide the representation is maintainable under Article 226.
Ajay Kumar Sharma
State of Punjab
Director General of Police, Punjab
and others
Mehinder Singh Sullar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
