This petition was declared infructuous as the remaining unadjusted petitioners were expected to be adjusted soon per norms.
Instant petition declared infructuous and disposed of accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.W.P. No.1577 of 2010
Rachna Devi and others v. State of Haryana and others.
Present:Shri S.P.Chahar, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri Harish Rathee, Senior D.A.G. Haryana.
MAHESH GROVER,J.
Shri Rathee, Senior D.A.G.Haryana states with reference to para-5 of the written statement filed by Shri D.R.Bansal, Deputy Director Administration, that all the petitioners except petitioners No.5 to 8 have been adjusted according to the norms of NCVT & DGE&T and petitioners No.5 to 8 will be adjusted very soon. As such the instant petition has been rendered infructuous.
Ordered accordingly.
January 12, 2011 GD
( MAHESH GROVER ) JUDGE
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Rachna Devi and others
State of Haryana
Mahesh Grover
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
