Court disposed of the writ petition as infructuous because the underlying restraint order was set aside by a subsequent judgment releasing the respondent.
Disposal of the writ petition
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.15754 of 2006 (O&M) Date of Decision: 14.02.2011 ****
Miss Ramanpreet Kaur
VS.
State of Punjab & Ors.
CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT
1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2. To be referred to the Reporters or not?
3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?
Present: Mr. PC Chaudhary, Advocate for the petitioner
Ms. Monica Chhibber Sharma, DAG Punjab *****
SURYA KANT J. (ORAL)
(4). Dasti .
CWP No.15754 of 2006.doc
14.02.2011 (S u r y a K a n t) vishal shonkar Judge
2
Miss Ramanpreet Kaur
State of Punjab
Surya Kant
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
