The petitioner withdrew the Civil Writ Petition. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn on the statement of the petitioner's counsel.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
Civil Writ Petition No.14292 of 2009
DATE OF DECISION : APRIL 25, 2011
NARENDER PAL SINGH
....... PETITIONER(S)
VERSUS
COMMISSIONER, HISAR DIVISION, HISAR & ORS.
.... RESPONDENT(S)
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA
PRESENT: Sarvshri Gaurav Singla & Sanjiv Gupta, Advocates, for the petitioner(s). Mr. SS Nara, Sr. DAG, Haryana. Mr. Arvind Singh, Advocate, for respondent No.4. Dr. Surya Parkash, Advocate, for respondent No.5.
AJAI LAMBA, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner state that let the
writ petition be dismissed as withdrawn.
Dismissed as withdrawn on the statement of learned
counsel for the petitioner.
April 25, 2011 ( AJAI LAMBA ) Kang JUDGE
1.To be referred to the Reporters or not?
2.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?
NARENDER PAL SINGH
COMMISSIONER, HISAR DIVISION, HISAR & ORS.
AJAI LAMBA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
