The petitioner challenged orders restoring a watercourse. Parties reached an agreement via court intervention on the watercourse path. The court disposed of the CWP based on this settlement.
Petition disposed of based on agreement between parties regarding the restoration path of the watercourse.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CWP No. 12837 of 2009
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No. 12837 of 2009 DATE OF DECISION: April 18, 2011
Harjeet Singh
.........PETITIONER(S)
VERSUS
Superintending Canal Officer, Ferozepur Canal Circle, Ferozepur and others
........ RESPONDENT(S)
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA
Present: Mr. H.S. Bhullar, Advocate, for the petitioner(s).
Mr. G.S. Attariwala, Addl.A.G., Punjab.
Ms. Pooja Chopra, Advocate, for respondent no. 3.
AJAI LAMBA, J. (ORAL)
CWP No. 12837 of 2009
2
course was running which is required to be restored, as ordered in the impugned orders.
18.04.2011 (AJAI LAMBA) shivani JUDGE
Harjeet Singh
Superintending Canal Officer, Ferozepur Canal Circle, Ferozepur
others
AJAI LAMBA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
