An extraordinary temporary stay granted for two days to prevent possession in a SARFAESI Act case while DRT appeal proceeds, explicitly not a precedent.
Direction passed granting stay of execution/order only upto 22.07.2011.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-1-
C.W.P. No.12448 of 2011
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
C.W.P. No.12448 of 2011
Date of Decision. 18.07.2011
Surinder Chauhan son of Sh. Chet Ram Chauhan, resident of House No.9, Jagat Puri, Haibowal Kalan, Ludhaina presently residing at House No.11071, New Patel Nagar, Ludhiana
......Petitioner
Versus
Vijaya Bank, B.R.S. Nagar, Ludhiana through its Branch Manager and another
.....Respondents
Present: Mr. Gaurav Tangri, Advocate for the petitioner.
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN
-.-
K. KANNAN J.(ORAL)
-2-
C.W.P. No.12448 of 2011
taking in view hardship which the petitioner claims that he will be put if an order is not passed. This shall not be taken as a precedent or an adjudication on the merits of his claim stated in the writ petition. It will be dealt with independently by the DRT when the case is taken up by it.
under the signature of Reader attached to this Court.
(K. KANNAN) JUDGE
July 18, 2011 Pankaj*
Surinder Chauhan
Vijaya Bank
K. KANNAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
