Petitioner sought an order based on a judgment from the same bench regarding the same respondents. The judgment refers applicants to that related order and does not contain independent substantive ruling or reasoning.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No. 11029 of 2010 Date of Decision: 01.11.2011
Garima Singh
...Petitioner
Versus
Maharishi Dayanand University, Rohtak & another
..Respondents.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT
Present : Mr. N.K.Malhotra, Advocate, for the petitioner
Mr. Anurag Goyal, Advocate, for Maharishi Dayanand University, Rohtak
SURYA KANT, J.(Oral)
For orders see, order of even date passed in Civil Writ Petition No. 10997 of 2010 ( Monica Aggarwal and others V.
Maharishi Dayanand University, Rohtak and another ).
01.11.2011
' ravinder'
(SURYA KANT) JUDGE
Garima Singh
Maharishi Dayanand University, Rohtak
another
SURYA KANT
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
