The High Court dismissed a writ petition as infructuous on the ground that the term of the Managing Committee had already expired. The petitioner raised no specific objection to this view.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Civil Writ Petition No. 10915 of 2001 Date of decision : 17.10.2011
Lal Chand
...Petitioner
versus
State of Haryana and another
..Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR
Present: Mr. Jai Vir Yadav, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. D. Khanna, Additional A.G., Haryana for the respondents.
M ehinder S ingh S ullar, J. (Oral)
At the very outset, learned counsel has submitted that since the term of Managing Committee has already been expired, so, the instant writ petition becomes infructuous, which may be dismissed as such.
Learned counsel for respondents did not raise any objection, in this relevant connection.
In this view of the matter, the instant writ petition is dismissed, as having become infructuous, as prayed for.
October 17, 2011 ( M ehinder S ingh S ullar ) naresh.k Judge
Lal Chand
State of Haryana
Other
Mehender Singh Sullar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
