High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of a writ petition by retired employees seeking pension commutation restoration by relying on and referring to previous judgments.
Petition disposed of in terms of CWP No.7446 of 2008.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CWP No.10348 of 2011.doc
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.10348 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 14.07.2011
Sukhdev Sharma & Ors. . . . . Petitioners
VS.
State of Punjab & Anr. . . . . Respondents
CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT
1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2. To be referred to the Reporters or not?
3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?
Present: Mr. Anuj Kohli, Advocate for the petitioner(s)
SURYA KANT J. (ORAL)
CWP No.10348 of 2011.doc
others vs. State of Punjab and others) , decided on 21.07.2008 (Annexure P1).
(3).
During the course of hearing, learned counsel for the parties are ad idem that this writ petition deserves to be allowed in terms of CWP No.7446 of 2008 (Sohan Singh vs. State of Punjab & Anr.) (Annexure P9) decided on 30.03.2009, the operative part of which reads as under:-
“It has been brought to my notice that the aforesaid judgement is the subject matter of challenge before the Hon’ble Supreme Court in SLP No.25856 of 2008, which is still pending and vide interlocutory order dated 07.11.2008, contempt proceedings have been stayed. The issue being covered by the aforesaid Division Bench judgement all these petitions are disposed of in terms of the aforesaid judgement/ratio, referred to above. It is, however, made clear that this order shall remain subject to the outcome of SLP and the petitioner shall be entitled to seek its implementation through contempt or otherwise only on the disposal of the SLP or in the event, the interlocutory order of staying the contempt proceedings is vacated by Hon’ble Supreme Court at any stage.”
(4). Ordered accordingly. Dasti .
CWP No.10348 of 2011.doc
14.07.2011 (S u r y a K a n t) vishal shonkar Judge
1 issue framed by the court
Whether retired employees of the Government of Punjab are entitled to restoration of commutation of pension benefit after a circular was set aside.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Gian Chand and others vs. State of Punjab and othersReferred¶21
CWP No.15554 of 2007
Sohan Singh vs. State of Punjab & Anr.Referred¶26
CWP No.7446 of 2008
Sukhdev Sharma & Ors.
State of Punjab & Anr.
Surya Kant
Vishal Shonkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
