The petitioner failed to appear for hearing. The Court observed lack of interest and dismissed the writ petition as non-prosecuted.
Writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution due to absence of petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
Civil Writ Petition No.10281 of 1996 (O&M) Date of decision : 11.7.2011.
S.Z.H. Naqvi ...Petitioner
Versus
The State of Haryana & another
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA
Present: None for the petitioner.
Mr. Anil Kumar Malik, Dy. Advocate General, Haryana.
Rajan Gupta, J. (oral)
Case has been called out several times since morning. Nobody has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioner. It appears that petitioner is no longer interested in pursuing this petition.
Dismissed for non-prosecution.
(RAJAN GUPTA) JUDGE
11.7.2011 'rajpal'
S.Z.H.
The State of Haryana
Rajan Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
