Single judge disposed of the current criminal revision petition in conformity with a previous order passed by this court in a related co-accused's case regarding the same matter.
The petition was disposed of in terms of Cr. Revision No. 1524 of 2001.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRR No.1549 of 2001 Date of decision: 16.02.2011
Darshan Singh
....Petitioner
Versus
State (UT Chandigarh)
....Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH
Present: - Mr. Sunil Chadha, Advocate, for
1.Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?
ALOK SINGH, J (ORAL)
Learned counsel for the petitioner has vehemently argued that revision of the co-accused being Cr. Revision No.1524 of 2001 was decided by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 23.3.2009, copy of which is handed over in the Court, which is taken on record. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that present petition be disposed of in terms of the order passed by this Court in Cr. Revision No.1524 of 2001 titled “Charanjit Singh Vs. State (U.T. Chandigarh) .
Disposed of in terms of the order passed in Cr. Revision
No.1524 of 2001 titled “Charanjit Singh Vs. State (U.T. Chandigarh) .
(Alok Singh) Judge
February 16, 2011 R.S.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Charanjit Singh Vs. State (U.T. Chandigarh)Followed¶15
Cr. Revision No.1524 of 2001
Darshan Singh
State
Alok Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
