Natasha Behl v. State of Punjab & Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Crl.…
COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Crl.…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH
Crl. Misc. No. M-712 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: November 2,2011
Natasha Behl................................................ Petitioner
Versus
The State of Punjab and another ................ Respondents
Coram: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Ritu Bahri
1.To be referred to the Reporters or not?
Present: Mr. Rahul Sharma-I, Advocate for the petitioner.
RITU BAHRI, J. (Oral)
Counsel for the petitioner states that the present petition has been rendered infructuous as the FIR in the present case has been quashed vide order dated 8.3.2011 passed in Crl. Misc. No. M-6269 of 2011 (Annexure A-1).
In view of the order passed by this Court in Crl. Misc. No. M-6269 of 2011, this petition has been rendered infructuous.
Disposed of as such.
2.11.2011 ( RITU BAHRI ) Rupi JUDGE
Natasha Behl
The State of Punjab
Ritu Bahri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court