with Section 120-B IPC on 10.2.2003. IN that case the respondent is facing trial. An FIR No.24 dated 16.12.1996 was lodged by the son of the complainant under Sections 326 and 324 IPC against the petitioner and his sons at Police Station Nurpur Bedi. The petitioner was acquitted of the offence vide judgment dated 15.6.2005. Another suit No.173 of 2001 dated 24.7.2001 was filed by respondent No.2 against the petitioner for recovery of Rs.1,00,000/- as compensation. A compromise was effected between the parties and the same was got dismissed as withdrawn vide order dated 11.6.2005. In this compromise, it is agreed that respondent No.2 would pay a sum of Rs.5,00,000/to the petitioner for dragging him into unnecessary litigation. It was agreed that respondent No.2 will give Rs.5,00,000/- to Sukhdev Singh, a common man for being given to the petitioner after withdrawal of the cases but Rs.5,00,000/were not paid to the petitioner after the cases were withdrawn. However, on 30.3.2006 respondent No.2 called the petitioner to tehsil complex for getting payment of Rs.5,00,000/- in terms of the compromise. By playing fraud upon the petitioner, he got his thumb impressions on a number of papers. Son of Hazara Singh reached the tehsil complex and read the documents and saw that thumb impressions of Hazara Singh were got on a sale deed alleged to be executed by him in favour of Karam Singh of the land and house for a sum of Rs.2,50,000/-. It was also mentioned in the sale deed that Hazara Singh had already received Rs.2,50,000/-. On detecting the fraud, the petitioner left with his son and moved an application to the Sub Registrar on 30.3.2006 with a copy to SHO Police Station Nurpur Bedi regarding the fraud played upon the petitioner by Karam Singh-respondent No.2. No action was taken by the police on this application.
