Petitioners sought protection against forced marital disposal by parents under Section 482 Cr.P.C. Court found the petition infructuous due to filed written statement and disposed of the matter.
None granted; petition disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
Crl. Misc. No.M-36357 of 2010
Date of Decision: 16.02.2011
Manjit Kaur and another
....Petitioners
Versus
State of Punjab and others
...Respondents
CORAM : Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur
Present:Mr. Gurpreet Singh, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. J.S. Pannu, D.A.G., Punjab for the respondent-State.
Mr. D.R. Singla, Advocate for respondents No.4 and 5.
**
NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. (ORAL)
This is a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C for issuance of directions to respondents No.2 and 3 to safeguard the life and liberty of the petitioners as they have got married against the wishes of respondents No.4 and 5.
Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the present petition has been rendered infructuous in view of the written statement filed by the State.
Disposed of as such.
(NIRMALJIT KAUR) 16.02.2011 JUDGE gurpreet
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a Section 482 Cr.P.C petition seeking protection against marital disposal against wishes of parents is maintainable.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Manjit Kaur and another
State of Punjab and others
Nirmaljit Kaur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
