This Single Judge allowed an application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. The court held that since parties reached an amicable settlement via mediation, the interim bail order issued earlier was made absolute.
The interim bail order dated 30.8.2010 was made absolute.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl. Misc. No. M-25310 of 2010
Date of Decision: 01.02.2011
Abhimanyu Goswamy
.... Petitioner
Versus
U.T. Administration
... Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH
Present : Mr. Sudeep Mahajan, Advocate for the petitioner
Mr. Rajiv Sharma, Advocate for U.T. Chandigarh
Mr. Deepak Aggarwal, Advocate
ALOK SINGH, J. (ORAL)
This is an application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. seeking anticipatory bail in a case FIR No. 242 dated 24.7.2010 under Sections 406, 498-A IPC registered at Police Station Sector 34, Chandigarh.
This Court vide order dated 30.8.2010 has granted interim bail in favour of the petitioner.
Learned counsel for the parties have fairly stated that with the efforts of Mediation and Conciliation Centre of this Court, parties have arrived at amicable settlement.
In view of this, present petition is allowed. Order dated
30.8.2010 is made absolute.
(ALOK SINGH) JUDGE
01.02.2011 reena
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petition for anticipatory bail should be allowed after an amicable settlement has been reached between the parties.
Whether the interim bail order should be made absolute.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Abhimanyu Goswamy
U.T. Administration
Allok Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
