Single judge order allowing quashing of FIR under Section 420 IPC due to settlement of disputes by compromise where complainant was unwilling to prosecute. The court held no purpose would be served by continuing proceedings.
FIR No.44 dated 17.5.2011 under Section 420 IPC registered with Police Station Mehna, District Moga is hereby quashed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH
Criminal Miscellaneous No. M-21717 of 2011 (O & M) Date of Decision: September 15, 2011
Manjit Singh
.....PETITIONER(S)
VERSUS
State of Punjab & another
.....RESPONDENT(S)
. . .
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA
PRESENT: - Mr. J.S. Brar, Advocate, for Mr. B.S. Bhalla, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Ms. Ravinder Kaur Nihalsinghwala, Additional Advocate General, Punjab, for respondent No.1.
Mr. R.S. Sidhu, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
. . .
AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral)
prays for quashing FIR No.44 dated 17.5.2011 under Section 420 IPC, registered with Police Station Mehna, District Moga, on the basis of compromise.
Crl. Misc. No. M-21717 of 2011 [2]
transaction, the FIR came to be lodged. The disputes have been settled by way of compromise.
(AJAI LAMBA)
September 15, 2011 JUDGE avin
Crl. Misc. No. M-21717 of 2011 [3]
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an FIR under Section 420 IPC registered on account of money transaction should be quashed on compromise.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Manjit Singh
State of Punjab
Gurmail Singh
AJAI LAMBA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
