none
petition disposed with liberty to avail alternate remedies. No investigation transfer.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH
Criminal Miscellaneous No. M-12487 of 2010 (O & M) Date of Decision: September 14, 2011
Ajay Kumar
.....PETITIONER(S)
VERSUS
State of Haryana & others
.....RESPONDENT(S)
. . .
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA
PRESENT: - Mr. S.S. Khurana, Advocate, for Mr. Mukesh Yadav, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. B.S. Saini, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, for respondent Nos.1 to 3.
Mr. Sandeep Kumar Yadav, Advocate, for respondent No.4.
. . .
AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral)
under Section 482 Cr.P.C. praying for transfer of investigation of case FIR No.13 dated 20.1.2010 (Annexure P-1) under Sections 379, 149, 447, 506 IPC, Police Station, Ateli Mandi, District Mohindergarh.
Crl. Misc. No. M-12487 of 2010 [2]
pointed out that cancellation report has already been filed. Rather, proceedings are being initiated against the petitioner under Section 182 IPC.
petitioner to avail of alternate remedies in accordance with law.
(AJAI LAMBA) September 14, 2011 JUDGE avin
AJAY KUMAR
STATE OF HARYANA
AJAI LAMBA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
