The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of two connected petitions filed by Mukesh and Kusum against the Union Territory of Chandigarh. The court set aside the petitions as they were withdrawn by the petitioners at the stage of oral hearing.
Petitions set aside as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-20588 of 2011 Date of Decision: 01.08.2011
Mukesh . . .Petitioner Versus Union Territory, Chandigarh . . . Respondent ******* CRM-M-21021 of 2011 Date of Decision: 01.08.2011** Kusum . . .Petitioner Versus Union Territory, Chandigarh . . . Respondent ******* CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN ******* Present: Mr.Sandeep Gahlawat, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). Ms.Ashima Mor, Advocate, for U.T. Chandigarh. *********
RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J (ORAL)
Learned counsel for the petitioner(s) prays for withdrawal of the petition at this stage. Dismissed as withdrawn. A photocopy of this order be placed on the file of another connected case.
(RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) AUGUST 01, 2011 JUDGE vivek
Mukesh
Kusum
Union Territory, Chandigarh
Rakesh Kumar Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
