Petitioners moved for withdrawal of the criminal miscellaneous petition with liberty to file a fresh petition on the same cause of action. The court allowed the withdrawal.
Withdrawal of the petition allowed with liberty to file a fresh petition on the same cause of action.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl. Misc. No. M-18167 of 2008
Date of Decision:12.01.2011
Satinder Singh and another
.....Petitioners
Vs.
State of Punjab and another
.....Respondents
CORAM:- HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY
Present:Mr. Amandeep Singh Manaise, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Gaurav Garg Dhuriwala, AAG, Punjab for respondent No.1.
Mr. G.S. Pannu, Advocate for Mr. A.D.S. Sukhija, Advocate for respondent No.2.
DAYA CHAUDHARY, J.(Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioners, on instructions from the
petitioners, who are present in Court, wants to withdraw the present petition
with liberty to file fresh on the same cause of action.
Dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.
January 12, 2011 ( DAYA CHAUDHARY ) renu JUDGE
Satinder Singh
State of Punjab
Daya Chaudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
