Disposed

Gagandeep Kaur & Anr. v. State of Punjab & Ors.

Punjab & Haryana HC25 May 2011CRM-M/16380/2011

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed an application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. directing the SSP, Bathinda, to verify the petitioners' age, marriage, and apprehensions of threats, and provide protection if serious threats are confirmed.

What did the court decide?

Directing the SSP, Bathinda to verify the petitioners' details and provide necessary protection if serious threats are confirmed.

Gagandeep Kaur & Anr. Vs State… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Punjab & Haryana HC (2011)

¶1

(1)

¶2

Crl. Misc. No. M-16380 of 2011 (O&M)

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶4

Crl. Misc. No. M-16380 of 2011 (O&M)

¶5

DATE OF DECISION: 25.05.2011

¶6

Gagandeep Kaur and another ..........Petitioners

¶7

Versus

¶8

State of Punjab and others

¶9

..........Respondents

¶10

BEFORE:- HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY

¶11

Present:Mr. H.S. Dhindsa, Advocate for the petitioners.

¶12

¶13

DAYA CHAUDHARY, J.

¶14

Crl. Misc. No. 29441 of 2011

¶15

Application is allowed as prayed for.

¶16

Crl. Misc. No. M-16380 of 2011

¶17

The present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed on behalf of Gagandeep Kaur and Jagjit Singh for issuing directions to the official respondents to protect their lives and liberty as they have solemnized their marriage contrary to the wishes of private respondents.

¶18

Both the petitioners are present in Court and claim themselves to be major on the basis of documents annexed with the petition and they are apprehending threats at the instance of private respondents.

¶19

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have moved a representation (Annexure P-6) to respondent No.2 i.e. SSP, Bathinda but no action has been taken. Learned counsel for the petitioners further submits that the petitioners would be satisfied if the representation

¶20

(2)

¶21

Crl. Misc. No. M-16380 of 2011 (O&M)

¶22

filed by them is decided within some specified period and moreover, there is no legal impediments in issuing such directions.

¶23

Without commenting anything on the merits of the case as well validity and age of the petitioners, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2-SSP, Bathinda to look into the representation (Annexure P-6) filed by the petitioners and after verifying the factual position with regard to their age, marriage and apprehension at the instance of private respondents, if he comes to the conclusion that a serious threat is there, then necessary protection be provided as per law.

¶24

Disposed of accordingly.

¶25

May 25, 2011 (DAYA CHAUDHARY) pooja JUDGE

Gagandeep Kaur & Anr. v. State of Punjab & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gagandeep Kaur & Anr. v. State of Punjab & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Preety and Anr. Vs State of Punjab and Ors.

Gurshabad Singh and Anr. Vs State of Punjab and Ors.

Kamalpreet Kaur & Anr. Vs State of Punjab & Ors.

Jaslin Kaur and Anr. Vs State of Punjab and Ors.

Randeep Kaur & Anr. Vs State of Punjab & Ors.

Inderpal Singh @ Mintu and Ors. Vs State of Punjab and Ors.