Allowed

Aarti & Anr. v. State of Haryana & Ors.

Punjab & Haryana HC23 May 2011CRM-M/15886/2011

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana, in a criminal miscellaneous petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C., issued a direction to the SSP, Rewari to investigate threats faced by petitioners who married against family wishes. The Court directed the respondent to verify petitioner ages and apprehensions and provide protection if serious threats existed, without commenting on the merits of the case.

What did the court decide?

Direction to SSP, Rewari to verify facts and apprehensions and provide necessary protection if serious threat is found.

Aarti & Anr. Vs State of Harya… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Punjab & Haryana HC (2011)

¶1

(1)

¶2

Crl. Misc. No. M-15886 of 2011 (O&M)

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶4

Crl. Misc. No. M-15886 of 2011 (O&M)

¶5

DATE OF DECISION: 23.05.2011

¶6

Aarti and another

¶7

..........Petitioners

¶8

Versus

¶9

State of Haryana and another

¶10

..........Respondents

¶11

BEFORE:- HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY

¶12

Present:Mr. K.K. Saini, Advocate for the petitioners.

¶13

¶14

DAYA CHAUDHARY, J.

¶15

Crl. Misc. No. 28525 of 2011

¶16

Application is allowed as prayed for.

¶17

Crl. Misc. No. M-15886 of 2011

¶18

The present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed on behalf of Aarti and Sonu for issuing directions to the official respondents to protect their lives and liberty as they have solemnized their marriage contrary to the wishes of private respondents.

¶19

Both the petitioners are present in Court and claim themselves to be major on the basis of documents annexed with the petition and they are apprehending threats at the instance of private respondents.

¶20

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have moved a representation (Annexure P-5) to respondent No.2 i.e. SSP, Rewari but no action has been taken. Learned counsel for the petitioners further submits that the petitioners would be satisfied if the representation filed by them is decided within some specified period and moreover, there

¶21

(2)

¶22

Crl. Misc. No. M-15886 of 2011 (O&M)

¶23

is no legal impediments in issuing such directions.

¶24

Without commenting anything on the merits of the case as well validity and age of the petitioners, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2-SSP, Rewari to look into the representation (Annexure P-5) filed by the petitioners and after verifying the factual position with regard to their age, marriage and apprehension at the instance of private respondents, if he comes to the conclusion that a serious threat is there, then necessary protection be provided as per law.

¶25

Disposed of accordingly.

¶26

May 23, 2011 pooja

¶27

(DAYA CHAUDHARY) JUDGE

Aarti & Anr. v. State of Haryana & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Aarti & Anr. v. State of Haryana & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Manjeet Singh & Ors. Vs State of Haryana & Ano.

Arun Kumar etc. Vs Ut Administration, Chandigarh

Sonia & Anr. Vs State of Punjab & Ors.

Sudesh Kumar Sharma Vs State of Haryana and Anr.

Sudesh Kumar Sharma Vs State of Haryana and Anr.

Pooja & Anr. Vs State of Haryana & Ors.