Petitioner sought review of bail. Court noted co-accused Liaquat Ali's case differs from petitioner's as no injury was attributed to the latter. Order disposed as withdrawn with direction for expeditious disposal of trial.
Order disposed as withdrawn with direction to the trial Court to expeditiously dispose of the trial.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Crl. Misc. No.M-15285 of 2011 (O&M)
Hakku @ Hakmuddin Versus State of Haryana
PRESENT
Mr.Roopak Bansal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms.Sushma Chopra, Addl. A.G., Haryana.
Counsel for the petitioner submits that co-accused have been granted the concession of bail.
I have considered the allegation against the coaccused namely Liaquat Ali. No specific injury is attributed to Liaquat Ali. Case of the petitioner is not at par with that of Liaquat Ali
Disposed of as withdrawn, at this stage, with a direction to the trial Court to expeditiously dispose of the trial.
(M.M.S.BEDI) JUDGE August 11, 2011. rka
Hakku @ Hakmuddin
State of Haryana
M.M.S. Bedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
