Allowed

Moshmi & Anr. v. State of Haryana & Ors.

Punjab & Haryana HC18 May 2011CRM-M/15175/2011

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners sought directions under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to protect their lives and liberty after marrying contrary to respondent's wishes and apprehending threats. Court directed SSP to verify facts and provide protection if serious threat exists.

What did the court decide?

Directed SSP, Sonepat to verify facts and provide necessary protection to petitioners if a serious threat is found.

Moshmi & Anr. Vs State of Haryana & Ors. — Matrimonial and Divorce | Punjab & Haryana HC (2011)

¶1

(1)

¶2

Crl. Misc. No. M-15175 of 2011 (O&M)

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶4

Crl. Misc. No. M-15175 of 2011 (O&M)

¶5

DATE OF DECISION: 18.05.2011

¶6

Moshmi and another

¶7

..........Petitioners

¶8

Versus

¶9

State of Haryana and others

¶10

..........Respondents

¶11

BEFORE:- HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY

¶12

Present:Mr. Parveen Kumar Rohila, Advocate for the petitioners.

¶13

¶14

DAYA CHAUDHARY, J.

¶15

Crl. Misc. No. 27337 of 2011

¶16

Application is allowed as prayed for.

¶17

Crl. Misc. No. M-15175 of 2011

¶18

The present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed on behalf of Moshmi and Takdeer for issuing directions to the official respondents to protect their lives and liberty as they have solemnized their marriage contrary to the wishes of private respondents.

¶19

Both the petitioners are present in Court and claim themselves to be major on the basis of documents annexed with the petition and they are apprehending threats at the instance of private respondents.

¶20

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have moved a representation (Annexure P5) to respondent No.2 i.e. S.S.P., Sonepat but no action has been taken. Learned counsel for the petitioners further submits that the petitioners would be satisfied if the representation filed by them is decided within some specified period and

¶21

(2)

¶22

Crl. Misc. No. M-15175 of 2011 (O&M)

¶23

moreover, there is no legal impediments in issuing such directions.

¶24

Without commenting anything on the merits of the case as well validity and age of the petitioners, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2-S.S.P., Sonepat to look into the representation (Annexure P-5) filed by the petitioners and after verifying the factual position with regard to their age, marriage and apprehension at the instance of private respondents, if he comes to the conclusion that a serious threat is there, then necessary protection be provided as per law.

¶25

Disposed of accordingly.

¶26

May 18, 2011 (DAYA CHAUDHARY) pooja JUDGE

Moshmi & Anr. v. State of Haryana & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Moshmi & Anr. v. State of Haryana & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vineet Handa Vs State of Haryana and Another

Narang Singh Vs State of Punjab & Ors.

Robinjit Kaur and Anr. Vs State of Punjab and Ors.

Sabnam & Anr. Vs State of Haryana & Ors.

Jasbir Singh & Anr. Vs State of Punjab & Ors.

Reena @ Neena & Anr. Vs State of Punjab & Ors.