Rakesh Kadian and Anr. v. Ut of Chandigarh
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-14728 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 12.08.2011
Rakesh Kadian and another Versus State of UT Chandigarh ******* CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN *******
. . .Petitioners
. . . Respondent
Present: Mr.G.S. Kaura, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr.P.K. Khindria, Advocate, for UT Chandigarh.
RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J (ORAL)
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has joined the investigation. This fact is conceded by learned counsel for U.T. Chandigarh, on instructions received from SI Inder Singh.
In view thereof, order dated 03.06.2011 is hereby made absolute subject to the conditions already contained therein.
Petition is disposed of.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Rakesh Kadian and another
- respondent
State of UT Chandigarh
Coram
Rakesh Kumar Jain
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Punjab & Haryana HC
- Decided on
- · August
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRM-M/14728/2011
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court