The court stayed the arrest of the petitioner in a non-bailable offence involving IPC 452 and 336. The stay is made absolute to enable regular bail proceedings at the trial court after the challan is presented.
The order staying arrest is made absolute. Petitioner to approach trial court for regular bail later.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl. Misc. No. M- 13223 of 2011 DATE OF DECISION: February 16, 2012
Navpreet Singh Nibber
.....Petitioner
VERSUS
State of Punjab and another ....Respondents
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH
PRESENT: Mr. Baljinder Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Gaurav Garg Dhuriwala, DAG, Punjab, for the State.
RANJIT SINGH, J.
The only non-bailable offence alleged against the petitioner is under Section 452 IPC. The offence qua the use of fire arms is only under Section 336 IPC as alleged in the FIR. The petitioner had earlier joined investigation while his case was pending before the Sessions Court.
Without making any comment on merit, the order dated 10.5.2011 staying the arrest of the petitioner is made absolute. The petitioners would be at liberty to approach the trial Court for regular bail. Once the challan is presented, trial Court would consider the case for grant of regular bail in the light of order passed by this Court. If needed for further investigation, the petitioner may be
summoned through a proper notice.
February 16, 2012 ( RANJIT SINGH ) monika JUDGE
Navpreet Singh Nibber
State of Punjab
RANJIT SINGH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
