The High Court of Punjab and Haryana held that the case was not a fit one for quashing proceedings under Section 482 Cr.P.C., allowing the petitioner to raise all pleas at the trial stage before dismissing the application.
Application dismissed with liberty to raise all pleas before the trial Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl. Misc. No. M- 1306 of 2010
DATE OF DECISION: November 29, 2011
Sanjeev Kumar
.....Petitioner
VERSUS
State of Punjab & another ....Respondents
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH
PRESENT: Mr. Malkeet Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Gaurav Garg Dhuriwala, DAG, Punjab, for the State.
Mr. A.S. Virk, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
RANJIT SINGH, J.
The petitioner would be at liberty to raise all the
pleas before the trial Court. It is not a fit case for quashing the proceedings under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Dismissed with the aforesaid liberty.
November 29, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) monika JUDGE
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the present case is a fit case for quashing the criminal proceedings under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sanjeev Kumar
State of Punjab
Respondent No.2
Ranjit Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
