The petitioners sought to withdraw their criminal miscellaneous petition with liberty to avail alternative remedy. The court allowed the withdrawal of the petition as prayed by the counsel for the petitioners.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to avail alternative remedy, if any.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Crl. Misc. No. M-12209 of 2011 1
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
Crl. Misc. No. M-12209 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision : 26.4.2011
Ram Kumar Sharma & another
...Petitioners
Versus
State of Haryana
...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA
Present: Dr. Naresh Kaushik, Advocate for the petitioners.
Rajan Gupta, J. (oral)
After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he be allowed to withdraw the present petition with liberty to avail of alternative remedy, if any.
In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioners, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as aforesaid.
(RAJAN GUPTA) JUDGE
26.4.2011 'rajpal'
Ram Kumar Sharma & another
State of Haryana
Rajan Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
