Rajinder Singh v. State of Punjab
Case brief
What is this about?
Coram Justice Rajan Gupta allowed a petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for anticipatory bail, making an interim order absolute as the petitioner joins investigation.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl.Misc.No.M-12078 of 2011
DATE OF DECISION: May 26, 2011
Rajinder Singh
…..Petitioner
versus
State of Punjab
.....Respondent
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA
Present: Mr.P.K. Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner
Mr.Vikas Malik, AAG, Haryana
Mr.KDS Hooda, Advocate for the complainant
..
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to make interim anticipatory bail order absolute subject to conditions.
Whether the petitioner's joining investigation warrants converting interim bail to absolute.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Rajinder Singh
- respondent
State of Punjab
Coram
RAJAN GUPTA
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Punjab & Haryana HC
- Decided on
- · May
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRM-M/12078/2011
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court