Harjit Singh @ Sonu v. Ut of Chandigarh
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl. Misc. No.M-11254 of 2011 Date of Decision: 14.09.2011
Harjit Singh alias Sonu
..... Petitioner
Versus
State of U.T. Chandigarh
..... Respondent
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI
Present: Mr. Naresh Gopal Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. J.S. Toor, APP, UT, Chandigarh, for the respondent.
M.M.S. BEDI, J.
In view of fact that all the prosecution witnesses have been examined, it will not be appropriate to enter into the niceties of the trial to appreciate the evidence to find out whether the petitioner is entitled to the concession of bail.
The petition is permitted to be withdrawn at this stage with liberty to raise all the pleas at appropriate time.
Disposed of as withdrawn.
14.09.2011 manju
(M.M.S. BEDI) JUDGE
Harjit Singh alias Sonu
State of U.T. Chandigarh
M.M.S. BEDI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court